Written By Sandra Warmoth

Builders of Zion International Relations Director

The Islamic revolution

that is sweeping the earth today is not radical Islam – it is Islam revealed. The zealous Muslims who are spearheading this revolution – the so-called terrorists – are simply faithful members of the Ummah,

the collective Muslim body, who are obeying that which is set forth in their Qur’an and the various writings on Islamic thought. Jihad, thus, is the norm for Islam, and the Muslim who is serious about his or her walk will eventually embrace its call or be executed for ignoring it. This is why there is such a collective muted response within the Muslim community when martyrdom operations are successfully carried out by Islam's faithful followers.

Allah makes it clear in no uncertain terms that he expects his adherents to wage jihad on all levels whenever there is “oppression” of his believers. A person who speaks out against Islam or the so-called “prophet,” Muhammad, is considered to be an oppressor of Muslims and an enemy of the faith. To be sure, the Politics of Oppression is a force to be reckoned with, especially when it shares a reciprocal relationship with Muslim “sensitivities.” The well-oiled Islamic propaganda machine does a masterful job at making victims look like culprits and culprits look like victims. The daily spin it so faithfully delivers arouses Muslim passions, tugs at our global humanistic heartstrings, stifles honest criticism of a fatalistic religion, makes for colorful news stories, and, of course, advances the Islamic revolutionary agenda.

Regarding agendas: There is no such thing as a “palestinian.” The Nobel-prize-winning pLO-thug-turned-“president,” Yasser Arafat, Mahmoud Abbas, and other despots, have tyrannized “palestinians,” but when was there ever a genuine leader who responsibly governed them? Indeed, there exists a Qur’an-inspired pLO Constitution, which seeks to wipe out the Jewish presence in the Promised Land and set up “palestinian” statehood upon the skulls of Zion’s sons, yet was there ever a veritable document.

that served to correctly guide “palestinians?” Other than the language of enmity and hate, what is the mother tongue of the “palestinians?” Other than International monies that typically never reach the populace for which they are earmarked, what is the “palestinian” currency? Arafat may have operated subversively in Egypt, Algeria, Lebanon and the fantasy Kingdom of Jordan, but where can you find a legitimate “palestinian” nation with historically and internationally recognized borders?

The so-called “palestinians” who identify themselves as such today derived not from the Aegean, non-Semitic ancient Philistines, as claimed, but rather from a hodgepodge of Arab and Muslim transient and landless migrants and peasants from the lands neighboring Israel. These Semites squatted on Jewish soil in search of work and better living conditions when the Jewish Homeland began springing back to life during several waves of Aliyah - Jewish Return. Others were imported wholesale by the Turkish government in an effort to guard its administration during its occupation of Israel's ancient lands from 1516-1917.

From the period of Roman domination until the British occupation in the early 1900s, the Jewish Homeland was reduced to a territory of transmutable provincial subdivisions, lacking frontiers, and having only administrative boundaries. In spite of the Romans and other ruthless conquerors, the Jewish People managed to maintain a continual presence, however small, in the Promised Land from the time of their last major expulsion in 70 C.E. until current.

The “palestinian refugee” problem began in 1948, a product of Arab and Muslim leaders enticing and intimidating the “palestinians” into leaving their homes so that the vast Arab and Muslim armies could mop up the Jews as they were revitalizing their ancient Homeland into a modern state. After losing the war, the Arab-Muslim bloc shut the door of citizenship on the unanticipated “refugees” and imprisoned them in perpetual camps along their borders. The leaders refused to allow official censuses to be conducted, and they grossly exaggerated the “refugee” population figures to draw world attention to

the situation and to induce the United Nations into pressuring Israel to “repatriate” the so-called “indigenous palestinians.” Disputing their bogus claims was a cumbersome process due in part to the inaccurate “official” population records in existence prior to this time.

During this period, the United Nations broadened the definition of refugee to include those Arabs and Muslims who had been in “palestine” for only two years prior to Israel's statehood. What is more, statistical information on the “palestinian refugee” figures were determined according to how many United Nations Relief and Work Agency (UNRWA) ration books were issued -- only these books were given freely to the multitudes of poverty stricken Arabs and Muslims in the region who never even lived in “palestine,” but yet were counted as “refugees.”

With the “refugees” stuck on the borders, and no way to militarily overcome the Jewish State after losing both the 1948 and 1967 wars that were initiated by the Arab-Muslim bloc, a two-decade-old idea of Arab activist Musa Alami took root: the indoctrination of a myth of nationality into the downtrodden “palestinian refugees” in order to create identity and stir up self-respect -- and anger. In “The Lesson of Palestine,” published in the Middle East Journal in October 1949, Alami argued: “How can people struggle for their own nation when most of them do not know the meaning of the word?”

Thus, the myth of a “palestinian homeland” was born, and to this day, the Arab-Muslim bloc refuses to repatriate its peoples, the “palestinians,” back into their natural homelands because, in the interest of advancing the Islamic revolution, they make wonderful political tools living in the squalid camps dotting the Middle Eastern landscape.

Between 1948-1973, the region's Arab and Muslim leaders embarked upon a massive, clandestine; officially ignored program of illegal immigration to Israel. Squatters from Egypt, Transjordan, Lebanon, Syria and other areas flooded the Land in a collective and calculated move to displace the Jewish residents.

This brings us to the modern-day revolutionary reality: One of the hallmarks of Islamization is infiltration. A targeted country is introduced to a progressive set of objectives -- the building up of a sizeable, vocal and politically active minority group, the consolidation of a power base through the exploitation of fundamental domestic systems, the assertion of Islamic human rights as a means of stirring up widespread sympathy, and the manipulation of these sympathies for the purpose of supporting a popular uprising. The uprising eventually leads to a full fledge insurrection, backed by terrorism where necessary, in order to accomplish a subversive ascension to power. This results in the ejection of any of the victimized country’s established political, economic, social, educational and religious systems that do not accommodate the new actuality. We see Islamic power

struggles of varying degrees of forcefulness and strains occurring throughout the world today.

Considering the August 2005 Gaza withdrawal, which displaced 8,000 Jews to make way for yet another Islamic stronghold, here is what a two-state solution in the Jewish Biblical Heartland has to offer: Should the radicalized “palestinian” populace successfully take over 95% of Judaea and Samaria, the so-called “west bank,” the genuine democratic check would be removed from the area and the hands of the guerilla groups they have been sheltering would be further strengthened. The judenrein Judaea and Samaria would be afflicted by a convergence of Islamic terrorist groups from both the west and east banks, which would provide a foothold for enemy states such as Iran and Syria that are sponsoring the terrorist operations inside Israel. This convergence would weaken the shrinking Jewish State, if not threaten her very existence, and it would frustrate the ability of the United States to militarily operate in the Middle Eastern theater. Along with the prized giveaway of the highly symbolic City of Jerusalem and its Holy Sites to

Muslim rule, it would also act as a catalyst to bring about the realization of an international Shari'ah superstate. Make no mistake: control over Jerusalem will signify to Muslims the world over that the time for insurrections within their host countries is nearing.